tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-329620774026489964.post7632613026433809675..comments2024-03-27T07:37:43.263+02:00Comments on The Non-Ex-Socionist: The Evolution of LoveUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-329620774026489964.post-67213737117310067992009-05-06T03:35:00.000+03:002009-05-06T03:35:00.000+03:00Hmm ...Unless Fisher is predicting that we have so...Hmm ...Unless Fisher is predicting that we have some gigantic war and eradicate over 90% of the global population, love is probably the only thing that will keep us together, surviving and co-existing peacefully. Sexuality was crucial up until roughly 50 years ago, when our population hit 3 billion. I may be wrong, but I think there's quite enough people for now and that the population could evenJeranimonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-329620774026489964.post-45676028340592886942009-03-25T03:50:00.000+02:002009-03-25T03:50:00.000+02:00Well said :)Well said :)Ричардhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06677696858512091176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-329620774026489964.post-87620388988487705882009-03-23T03:17:00.000+02:002009-03-23T03:17:00.000+02:00Maybe I'm naive, but I don't think the role of hor...Maybe I'm naive, but I don't think the role of hormones and neurotransmitters in love is depressing -- I don't think it makes love and attraction any less "real" and good to those experiencing it and I am personally determined to make the most of what my body has to offer in this regard. ^_^<BR/><BR/>(that probably sounded more sexual than intended :\ but I don't know how to say it better)<BR/><Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com